Allen Banks & Briarwood Banks

It had been a few years since I last visited my favourite ancient woodland sites at Allen Banks and Briarwood Banks — my most recent visit taking place during a student field trip in 2022. I’m not entirely sure why it’s taken me so long to return, but regardless, this week I was thrilled to get back into the swing of things leading a group of keen botanists from my ‘Botanist’s Year’ course on a walk along the River Allen, taking in the sights and sounds of these remarkable reserves.

Ancient woodland is a rare thing in Northumberland, especially in a truly diverse and undisturbed state. The River Allen catchment is one of the few places where it’s still possible not only to observe many of the characteristic plants of this special habitat, but to see them in abundance — a sight sorely lacking in my local patch around Newcastle. As we set out from the National Trust car park, it was immediately clear we were in for a treat: just about everything one hopes to find in such sites was flowering merrily.

Within moments of starting our walk, ancient woodland indicators began revealing themselves at a rapid pace. The first leg of the trip took us along the drier, upper slopes of the gorge, where we were treated to glorious patches of Wood Crane’s-bill Geranium sylvaticum alongside Goldilocks Buttercup Ranunculus auricomus — two species I encounter far too infrequently for my liking. Lower down, although the bluebells and wood anemones had finished flowering, Sanicle Sanicula europaea was in full bloom, and members of the group were quick to point out some lovely patches of Yellow Pimpernel Lysimachia nemorum.

One of the other curiosities during this leg of the trip was a mature variegated Sycamore Acer pseudoplatanus which may or may not be the cultivar Simon-Louis Freres. Presumably this was planted here by the Victorian custodians of the site but either way, it made for an impressive sight.

Continuing along the riverside path, our attention briefly turned to ferns, with sightings of most of the common species one might expect in a woodland like this: Hard Fern Blechnum spicant, Hard Shield-fern Polystichum aculeatum, Lady-fern Athyrium filix-femina, and others. Great Horsetail Equisetum telmateia was also noted, and several attractive woodland grasses gave us reason to pause. The most abundant was the delicate Wood Melick Melica uniflora, but we also recorded Hairy-brome Bromopsis ramosa, Giant Fescue Schedonorus giganteus, and perhaps most exciting of all, Wood Fescue Drymochloa sylvatica — a completely new plant for me, despite having unknowingly wandered past it for years. The Tyne catchment is one of the key strongholds for this rare woodland grass.

It wasn’t long, however, before our focus returned to flowers, with plenty of Bugle Ajuga reptans in bloom and Hybrid Avens Geum x intermedium growing alongside both of its parent species in a damp depression. Bitter-vetch Lathyrus linifolius and Wood Vetch Ervilia sylvatica were also observed, and a brief pause to key out specimens rewarded us with Intermediate Lady’s-mantle Alchemilla xanthochlora.

Another curiosity spotted on this leg of the trip was the attractive shrub shown below. Clearly a honeysuckle but which one? My money is on Fly Honeysuckle Lonicera xylosteum – likely an old introduction here.

Reaching the end of Allen Banks, we soon crossed the invisible boundary into the Northumberland Wildlife Trust’s reserve at Briarwood Banks. This is a fantastic site, carefully managed for a wide range of wildlife, including Hazel Dormice which are said to lurk in the undergrowth. Before venturing further, we stopped for lunch on a stunning patch of Calaminarian grassland, brimming with Mountain Pansies Viola lutea. As you can see, these little beauties come in a delightful range of colours, and personally, I’m especially fond of the less common yellow ones! This same area also held Common Bistort Bistorta officinalis on the riverbanks.

After lunch, it was time to begin our ascent up the banks, with Mel Rockett taking the lead, drawing on his extensive volunteering experience at the site. Our main target was Bird’s-nest Orchid which we had missed on the way in, but along the way we encountered a fine selection of species not seen earlier in the day, including Early-purple Orchid Orchis mascula and Common Cow-wheat Melampyrum pratense. Only when we reached the summit (and I’m not being melodramatic — the walk is genuinely steep at this point) did we finally find our quarry…

Thanks to Mel’s expert guidance, we finally caught up with Bird’s-nest Orchid Neottia nidus-avis. Two, to be exact, growing beneath a mature Beech Fagus sylvatica in a rocky patch of earth, far removed from the ‘rich humus’ they’re said to prefer in the textbooks. A quirky little plant, it may not be as striking as some of its orchid relatives, but it’s certainly fascinating: parasitic on the roots of its host tree and lacking the chlorophyll that gives most plants their green colour. These specimens weren’t fully open yet, but a few flowers had begun to reveal themselves.

While at Briarwood, we were also lucky enough to catch up with the rather delicate fern shown below. This is Oak Fern (Gymnocarpium dryopteris), a pretty uncommon species in our region, typically found in rocky, ancient woodlands. It was such a treat to see a thriving patch of it as we made our descent down the bank.

And that, folks, is a wrap. It’s always such a pleasure to get out and about with a group of keen botanists, especially when their local insight leads to unexpected encounters. A big thank you to Mel for taking the reins at Briarwood Banks.

The Best Plant App for Beginner Botanists: Comprehensive Edition

With so many plant ID apps available, it can be hard to know where to turn when trying to identify that pesky plant. Here, we set out to discover which plant app truly stands out as the best choice for beginner botanists

Though it may beggar belief, a post I shared here on Common By Nature comparing the best plant ID apps for beginner botanists, has become my most-viewed article to date, racking up over 25,000 views since 2022. Clearly, this is a popular topic, and more and more people are turning to plant identification apps to help identify their botanical finds. With that in mind, I thought it was time to revisit the topic three years on.

As I said back then, plant ID apps are a contentious subject among many botanists. Some dismiss them outright, claiming they’re unreliable and detract from what purists might call “proper” botany. Others take a more open-minded approach and, even among relative experts, treat plant ID apps as just another tool in their botanical toolkit, much like a hand lens or a wildflower guide.

Wherever you stand on the issue, it is clear that plant apps are here to stay. Thanks to advances in image recognition and Artificial Intelligence (AI), these apps are becoming more accurate, more sophisticated, and increasingly useful for enthusiastic amateurs and budding botanists alike. Not only to help identify unfamiliar plants but also as a means by which to deepen their interest and engagement with the natural world.

Of the many plant ID apps available, a few names crop up again and again. Most people will have heard of PlantNet, Seek, or Google Lens. Others, like Flora Incognita, are a little less well known, but all aim to do the same thing. The question is: are any of them truly a cut above the rest when it comes to plant identification?

Inspired by the ongoing interest in my original post, I decided to return to the subject three years later to find out what the best plant app is today.

Once again, some ground rules

Just like last time, and to standardise our little plant app experiment, I’ve introduced a few rules to keep things fair:

  • One image only. While some apps allow for multiple images, we wouldn’t want to give any one of them an unfair advantage, would we?
  • Quality images. We’ll only use clear photos showing enough of the plant to reach an accurate identification.
  • British plants. I’ve chosen species that are commonly found in Britain, making the test more relevant to British botanists. That said, the odd non-native or garden escapee might sneak in too, just to keep things interesting.

A small change

This time, I thought I’d make things a bit more challenging for our candidate plant apps by including several trickier groups of plants. Whereas last time we focused mainly on flowering species, this round will feature grasses, ferns, and even a sedge. That should really test their mettle…

On reflection, I’ve also decided to drop the “leaves only” rule. Realistically, most people are going to be using plant apps to identify flowers, so it makes sense to reflect that in the test. We’ll also be testing three more identification apps not covered in my last post.

Meet the subjects

I’ve selected the ten plants below based on their varying levels of difficulty. Some, like Herb-paris and Caper Spurge, should be relatively straightforward for the apps to identify. Others — Sea Spleenwort, for instance — may prove more of a challenge. The inclusion of Mountain Melic is admittedly a bit mean, given the lack of clear identification features, but hey, this is my blog, and we’re here to really put these plant apps to the test, aren’t we?

Plant app comparison

For comparison’s sake, we’ll stick with a similar scoring system to the one used in the previous post. Any plant app that correctly identifies the plant as their first choice will receive 1 point. If the correct plant appears lower down the list, points will be deducted based on its position. For example, if Oxford Ragwort comes as the fourth suggestion, it would earn 0.6 points. I may also award bonus points in certain cases if an app manages to genuinely impress me.

Garden Privet
Ligustrum ovalifolium
Beech Fern
Phegopteris connectilis
Oxford Ragwort
Senecio squalidus
Mountain Melic
Melica nutans
Sea Spleenwort
Asplenium marinum
Herb-paris
Paris quadrifolia
Remote Sedge
Carex remota
Dog-violet
Viola riviniana
Caper Spurge
Euphorbia lathyris
Chickweed- wintergreen
Lysimachia europaea
Score
(0-10)
PlantNet 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.7 1 19.7/10
PlantSnap✖ 0.1 (it did get Melica)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A0.1/10
(Stopped counting)
Picture This 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19/10
LeafSnap 1 1 1 1 0.9 1 1 1 1 19.9/10
Seek 1 1 1✖0.1 (Spleenwort, at least) 1✖0.1 (It did get sedge) 1 16.2/10
GoogleLens✖ 0.5 (Points for privet) 1 1 1 1✖0.1 (for violet 1 16.7/10
FloraIncognita 0.9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 18.9/10
Obsidentify 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.9 1 1 19.9/10

And there we have it, gang — a winner! Well, two actually, and only just by the skin of their teeth. In our little test, ObsIdentify and Leafsnap came out on top, closely followed by PlantNet, with PictureThis a smidgen behind. We’ll take a closer look at those top performers shortly, but first, let’s talk about the plant apps you might want to avoid…

The Losers

If you’re looking for an accurate plant app, best give these ones a miss. Particularly the first…

PlantSnap (0.1/10)

So bad I gave up…

PlantSnap struggled at nearly every turn, misidentifying four out of five plants and earning only a fractional bonus point for narrowing down Mountain Melic to the correct genus. Even more frustrating is its restrictive usage model — users are granted only a handful of free identifications before being hit with a 12-hour delay, clearly designed to push non-subscribers toward paying. Based on what I’ve seen, paying for this app would be, frankly, a waste of money.

PlantSnap performed poorly in our first test back in 2022, and despite the time that’s passed, it’s obvious little has improved. My advice? Avoid this one at all costs.

Seek (6.2/10)

iNaturalist is improving, but not enough

The last time we tested Seek, it performed abysmally and earned a rather negative review. I’m pleased to report that the app has shown some improvement. By correctly identifying six species — including both a grass and a fern — it managed to impress me to some degree.

That said, it’s still not quite strong enough for me to recommend it as a go-to plant ID tool. There are certainly better options available. Seek failed outright on Oxford Ragwort and Dog-violet, two fairly common species, and struggled with the sedge and one of the trickier ferns.

Given iNaturalist’s popularity among biological recorders, you’d hope Seek would perform better. For now, it still falls short of the mark.

Google Lens (6.7/10)

Meh, should do better with all that funding…

Google Lens is an immensely popular app, built into many smartphones by default. It has a wide range of uses — and performs well in many of them — but when it comes to plant identification, it falls slightly short of the mark.

Once again, it struggled with sedges and ferns, performed poorly on Dog-violet, and, somewhat surprisingly, failed to correctly identify Privet. Given the vast resources behind it, I expected better. While it’s certainly not the worst option out there, I still wouldn’t recommend it if you’re looking to accurately identify botanical finds.

In short, it’s far from the best plant ID app available.

Better Choices

Flora Incognita (8.9/10)

The worst of the good apps, but only just…

I had never used Flora Incognita before and didn’t include it in the last test, so I was genuinely excited to give it a try this time around. Truth be told, it performed quite well — just fractionally behind the top-performing apps — and deserves credit for correctly identifying both Sea Spleenwort and Remote Sedge, two species that tripped up several of the less accurate contenders. The only plant it really struggled with was, once again, the Dog-violet.

One particularly nice feature of Flora Incognita is that it allows users to make an initial classification (e.g. herb, shrub, grass, or fern) to help narrow down the search. It also supports multiple photo uploads, which I didn’t take advantage of this time but suspect could have improved the results. Another welcome touch is the inclusion of a confidence level with each ID suggestion — a small detail that adds transparency to the process.

All in all, this is a relatively strong choice for plant identification, and one I’d be happy to use again.

PictureThis (9/10)

Getting better all the time, and very nearly perfect…

PictureThis impressed me this time around, I must say. With the exception of Remote Sedge, it correctly identified all the plants down to species level with relative ease. The app is sleek, user-friendly, and offers a generally smooth experience. Its plant health assessment feature might not be of much interest to botanists, but it could be a welcome bonus for gardeners.

For those who enjoy background detail, PictureThis provides a wealth of information covering everything from characteristics and symbolism to pests, diseases, and garden uses. As I noted back in 2022, it remains a comprehensive and reliable option, and overall, a good, safe bet for botanists.

The Winners

If you are looking for an accurate, reliable plant app to help you on your botanical excursions, I’d choose from these…

PlantNet (9.7/10)

An old favourite performs well yet again…

When I last reviewed PlantNet, I admitted to being a fan, both for its plant identification capabilities and for its useful option to search by regional floras. This feature allows users to narrow their search to a specific geographical area, helping rule out, for example, North American species when the record is actually from the UK or Greece. It performed well in the previous test, but did even better this time, correctly identifying all but one plant to species level. The only slight miss was with the Dog-violet, which it listed as the third option, behind a couple of admittedly similar species.

Once again, this app comes highly recommended. Like all plant ID apps, it shouldn’t be relied on with absolute certainty, but it remains a valuable tool in any botanist’s arsenal.

LeafSnap (9.9/10)

One of the best botanical apps out there…

LeafSnap does it again, finishing ahead of the competition in joint first place! This result echoes what we found in 2022, when the app narrowly beat out contenders like PlantNet and Seek with a respectable 5 out of 6. This time, it performed even better by correctly identifying all the plants to species level, with the exception of Sea Spleenwort, which it listed as a very respectable second option.

If I have one minor complaint, it’s that the in-app prompts and ads seem to have become more frequent since my last test. That said, they’re easy enough to navigate and, in the grand scheme of things, a small price to pay for this level of accuracy.

LeafSnap remains a strong recommendation from me. It boasts all the features you’d want in a reliable plant app.

Obsidentify (9.9/10)

I didn’t include ObsIdentify back in 2022, but I really wish I had. This is a downright impressive app that matched LeafSnap on the scorecard, receiving only a minor deduction for Remote Sedge which it listed as a second choice. It might well have nailed it with a better photo — but let’s be honest, shoddy images are part and parcel of real-world use. In truth, I can’t fault this app on design, ease of use, or accuracy.

What sets ObsIdentify apart from the competition is that, while it’s a reliable choice for plant identification, it also covers all taxa. That means it works just as well for moths, hoverflies and other wildlife groups. The only area where it still struggles is fungi, but to be fair, most fungi can’t be confidently identified from a photo alone.

If you’re looking to streamline the number of apps on your phone, this is the one I’d recommend. Not only will it help with those pesky plants, but you might also find yourself getting hooked on identifying other species too. For beginners especially, it could become a trusty companion.

Bravo, ObsIdentify, bravo!

William Turner’s Herb-paris

Herb-Paris Paris quadrifolia is a perennial plant of damp, moderately calcareous woodlands. Blooming in late spring, it is a striking and distinctive species featuring a whorl of four ovate leaves. In May, a single flower emerges on an upright stem – a star-shaped bloom composed of four yellow-green petals and four green sepals, topped by a dark ‘berry’ and a crown of eight golden stamens.

Known as oneberrie in historic accounts, Herb-paris was first properly described in England by the father of English botany, William Turner (1508-1568), who wrote of his discovery:

The herb that hath bene taken for lyberdes bayne, groweth plentuousely besyde morpeth in Northumberland in a wod called cottyngwod’.

Never one to pass up an encounter with a special plant, this week, a chance visit to Morpeth as part of a course I’m leading provided the perfect opportunity to visit Cottingwood for myself.

Cottingwood is a small woodland nestled in the heart of Morpeth, Northumberland. That it has survived in a relatively unaltered state is something of a miracle – the deep, steep-sided valley offering protection from the spread of the affluent housing developments that have sprung up around it in the years since Turner visited. Today, it remains in relatively good condition and is home to many plants typically associated with ancient woodland: Bluebell, Wood Sedge, Great Horsetail, and others. Some areas of the wood appear well-trodden, but elsewhere, dense vegetation gives the impression that few people venture into this special and historically significant patch of greenery.

After navigating a few banks and narrow trails, we came upon a damp flush where, to our delight, the distinctive flowers of paris appeared in surprising abundance – growing in precisely the same spot where Turner described the plant centuries ago.

If the survival of Cottingwood itself is surprising, then the continued presence of Herb-paris at this little site borders on the miraculous. Now a rare species, it is often confined to particularly special habitats — its spread hindered by its own unique biology (it does, after all, produce only one seed annually). Even so, what a privilege it was to sit in the very same spot as one of our most eminent botanical forebears, admiring this weird, wonderful, and undeniably beautiful plant.

Spring flowers don’t come much better than this…

The Urban Ferns of Newcastle and North Tyneside

While recording for the Urban Flora, I’ve now encountered a total of 23 fern species growing in a wild or naturalised state within the conurbation. An additional three species have been submitted by fellow recorders, bringing the total to a healthy 26. This is quite an impressive number given the area covered, though it still represents a relatively small 2.3% of the total plant species recorded from the area.

Nonetheless, urban ferns are an interesting bunch. In the style of my previous posts [here] and [here], I thought I’d explore them properly on this blog — partly for reference, and partly in the hope that someone, somewhere, finds these rambles either useful or at least somewhat interesting.

Before I go any further, however, a very big thank you to Chris Barlow and David Jarema for making their photography available for projects such as this. It is most appreciated.

Common Ferns

The Big Five

The “big five” urban ferns represent the most common and widespread species within the conurbation. All are fairly familiar and either thrive in a wide variety of habitats or are associated with environments so ubiquitous that they’ve become an almost daily sight.

Chief among them is the Male Fern Dryopteris filix-mas, which has so far been recorded in 135 squares—an impressive 71% of those surveyed. It’s truly a fern that gets everywhere: from woodlands and hedgerows to urban walls, gutters, gardens, and even pavements close to overflowing drainpipes. While I doubt it will turn out to be truly ubiquitous across every square, it’s about as close as a fern can reasonably get.

Not far behind in the numbers game is Hart’s-tongue Asplenium scolopendrium, an evergreen fern of moist, shaded woodlands that is also frequently encountered on mortared walls and masonry. Recorded from 102 squares (53%), it’s certainly abundant.

Two other “wall ferns” are also doing well: Wall-rue Asplenium ruta-muraria, noted in 84 squares (44%), and Maidenhair Spleenwort Asplenium trichomanes, in 70 squares (36%). While marginally less widespread, both can be prolific where they occur – typically in older, more unkempt terraced neighbourhoods, where less rigorous weeding allows them to thrive. In contrast, they can be surprisingly scarce in modern developments or more affluent areas where tidiness tends to take priority.

The final fern worthy of inclusion in this section is Broad Buckler-fern Dryopteris dilatata. Typically a species of somewhat acidic, damp soils, it’s most often encountered in woodland settings. However, it has proven far more catholic in its habitat preferences than many other woodland ferns, turning up readily in newer woodlands, plantations, hedgerows, rail embankments, and even grassy habitats on occasion. So far, it has been recorded in 48 (25%) survey squares.

Localised Ferns

The next group of ferns are altogether more particular in their habitat preferences and occur much more sparingly across the conurbation — though not quite so sparsely as to be considered rare. With the exception of one notable species, all are best described as woodland ferns within Newcastle and North Tyneside. We’ll look at these first.

Hard Shield-fern Polystichum aculeatum and Soft Shield-fern Polystichum setiferum make for an interesting duo. The former is native to the area, typically inhabiting damp, shaded stream-sides and rocky ledges within woodland. The latter, meanwhile, is a more recent arrival, introduced occasionally but now subject to natural colonisation as well. Intriguingly, the two species are neck-and-neck in terms of occurrence, each recorded from 10 survey squares (5%). Both remain closely tied to the relic semi-natural woodland of Newcastle’s denes, though Soft Shield-fern has begun to spread a little more widely.

Another interesting pair are the Scaly Male-ferns. Within the conurbation, we seem to host two fairly frequent species and one rarer one (which I’ll cover later). Among the more commonly encountered are Borrer’s Male-fern Dryopteris borreri and Golden-scaly Male-fern Dryopteris affinis.

Of the two, D. borreri is notably more abundant, recorded in 26 survey squares 13.7%. While it tends to favour older woodland habitats, it also turns up elsewhere including newer plantations. D. affinis, on the other hand, is much more selective, preferring damp locations in older woodlands, and has been recorded in just 7 squares 3.7%. In fact, the only places I’ve found it in any real abundance are Jesmond and Wallbottle Denes, now that I think about it.

The conurbation’s wooded denes are also just about the only places where you’re likely to encounter Hard Fern Blechnum spicant these days. Recorded in 8 survey squares 4.2%, it is largely restricted to Sugley, Walbottle, Jesmond, and Denton Denes – with the only notable outlier being a small population at Gosforth Nature Reserve where the acid soils suit it well.

Two more uncommon species associated with the conurbation’s woodlands – albeit with a bit more flexibility – are Lady-fern Athyrium filix-femina and Bracken Pteridium aquilinum.

Lady-fern, recorded from 21 squares (11.1%), remains fairly localised, with the best populations once again found within the area’s wooded denes. However, it will readily colonise other damp, shaded spots such as ditches, hedgebanks, and more recent plantations.

Bracken, by contrast, is quite the opposite. It favours somewhat acidic soils in the drier, upper reaches of older woodlands, where it can be particularly abundant. Still, it’s far from confined to such settings and occurs more broadly across the conurbation as a colonist of all sorts of habitats, especially rail sidings and grassy banks. In total, Bracken has been observed in 29 squares (24%), though it is by no means “common”.

The final species worthy of mention at this stage is, rather refreshingly, not a fern of woodlands but instead a calcicole, favouring mortared walls in urban areas. Black Spleenwort Asplenium adiantum-nigrum has been recorded from 28 squares (14.7%) so far. While one of the less common wall ferns overall, it can be surprisingly plentiful in certain neighbourhoods, particularly around Walker, Heaton, and Wallsend. It also occurs sporadically in squares around Newcastle City Centre, including in spots where even more typical ferns like Wall-rue are absent.

Rare and Scarce Ferns

And so we come to the conurbation’s rare ferns – the ones that truly generate excitement when you stumble across them. There’s a surprising number of these, though they all tend to fall into two distinct categories: rare natives or exotic introductions. We’ll start by looking at the native species first…

Scarce Native Species

Kicking off our collection of rare woodland ferns is a duo found exclusively at Gosforth Nature Reserve —suggesting a preference for mildly acidic conditions.

Narrow Buckler-fern Dryopteris carthusiana has long been a rarity in the conurbation, with no local records since George Swan encountered it in the Gosforth Park back in the 1970s. That changed recently when local botanist, John Durkin, rediscovered it in wet woodland and relic acid grassland at the reserve. Found in just 1 square (0.5%), it is by all accounts a true local rarity. The same goes for its hybrid with Broad Buckler-fern, Dryopteris x deweveri, also noted from a single square (0.5%) during surveys by the same recorder.

Speaking of hybrids, Polystichum × bicknellii — the cross between Hard Shield-fern and Soft Shield-fern —has so far only been recorded from Jesmond Dene, where both parent species occur. Meanwhile, Gosforth Nature Reserve has produced two further exciting finds: Narrow Male-fern Dryopteris cambrensis and Lemon-scented Fern Oreopteris limbosperma, each recorded from just one square (0.5%). Both are, for now, exceptionally scarce within the conurbation.

Rustyback Asplenium ceterach has long been a rare fern on Tyneside. For years, it was known only from an exterior garden wall in North Shields where happily, it still persists today. Encouragingly, it was also recorded last year on an exterior wall in Brunswick, where it was growing in mortar alongside a mix of more familiar species. So far, Rustyback has been observed in just 2 squares (1.1%).

And since we’re on the subject of walls, now seems a fitting moment to turn our attention to the urban Polypodium species. Both Polypody Polypodium vulgare and Intermediate Polypody Polypodium interjectum are rare within the conurbation — though they may well be under-recorded.

P. vulgare has proven the more widespread of the two, typically occurring as a thinly distributed epiphyte of older woodlands, with records from Jesmond, Sugley, and Denton Denes. It also occasionally turns up on old walls, though here it remains quite scarce. To date, it has been recorded from 9 squares (4.7%). In contrast, P. interjectum is more characteristic of mortared walls and has been noted as a scattered colonist in 3 squares (1.6%).

A final rare native worthy of mention is the unusual Adder’s-tongue Ophioglossum vulgatum, a species typically found in higher-quality, neutral to acidic grasslands. Within the conurbation, it appears to be in decline – likely as aa consequence of poor grassland management in many areas. So far, it has been observed from just two well-known sites: a verge along Salter’s Lane and, in greater numbers, from grassland near Havannah Nature Reserve. It remains restricted to 2 squares (1.1%).

Some Exotic Ferns

As I’ve touched on in previous posts, Jesmond Dene is home to its fair share of weird and wonderful exotic plants, including several ferns. Most of these have been encountered near the remnants of a derelict Victorian fernery, and it’s hard to say whether they’ve persisted here for decades or are the result of more recent introductions. Either way, three exotic species now appear to be growing wild in the Dene: Japanese Shield-fern Polystichum polyblepharum, Japanese Buckler-fern Dryopteris erythrosora, and Western Sword-fern Polystichum munitum, each recorded from a single square (0.5%).

A fourth species, House Holly-fern Cyrtomium falcatum is not found in the dene but instead, has been noted from the base of a sunny garden wall in Gosforth – clearly having spread from planted stock nearby.

And really, who doesn’t enjoy a touch of the exotic while botanising the big city?

And there we have it, a not-so-concise tour of the urban ferns recorded as part of the project so far. There’s a surprising number out there waiting to be discovered. With the conurbation’s woodlands now fairly thoroughly surveyed, I suspect the distributions of many woodland species will remain relatively stable by the time the project wraps up. That said, we may well see an uptick in species colonising walls and masonry, particularly as urban habitats are surveyed in more depth.

I can’t imagine there are too many more species left to uncover but given the exotics mentioned above, you never really know what might be lurking just around the corner, do you? Good job there are some handy resources out there…

Urban Flora of Newcastle & North Tyneside – 2025 Update

Though it beggars belief, I am now four years into creating the first Urban Flora for Newcastle and North Tyne – a project that has consumed the vast majority of my free time of late with an ungodly amount of time spent combing the city to record the wild and naturalised plants that grow here. With the help of several other local botanists, things are now coming together quite quickly with only around 40 or so squares left to visit before we can call time on the recording stage of the project and move on to the all-important writing phase (gulp).

The process of piecing together this Flora has been nothing short of eye-opening. For one, it has been incredible to observe the sheer diversity of plant life thriving in the UK’s seventh-largest conurbation and now that we’re well into the ordeal, some fascinating trends are beginning to emerge. From the city’s most abundant species to its rarest, there’s a great deal to explore.

With that in mind, now seemed like as good a time as any for another urban update…

Some Headlines

In total, my fellow botanists and I have now recorded a whopping 1,042 species, subspecies, or hybrids growing in a wild or naturalised state across the 190 monads of conurbation from 2018-2025. This is far higher than I anticipated at the launch of the survey and makes for impressive reading when considered as a proportion of the British flora. Of these, around 52% are native species and 42% are neophytes (recent introductions). A further 6% are archaeophytes – species introduced in prehistory. The number of alien species in particular seems unusually high compared to other studies, but as you’ll soon see, there are likely a few reasons for this.

Astute readers may notice two small changes to my methodology this time around. First, the inclusion of records from 2018–2021. Given the sheer scale of the survey, this seemed like a practical decision. In practice, it equates to just 27 records per monad on average, with most focused on key sites such as Gosforth Nature Reserve. Second, the expansion of the survey area. While still somewhat limited, it was pointed out by several esteemed colleagues, that I may as well go the whole hog and cover the entire conurbation. So that’s exactly what I’ve done.

So far, about 200 of the recorded plants have been observed on just a single occasion, while the rest range from local rarities to common and widespread species found in most squares. Many of these one-off sightings are as expected either garden escapes or casual discards from cultivation. Freak occurrences, if you will. But interestingly, a good number of native species fall into this category too, including rarities such as Lesser Water-parsnip Berula erecta, Moschatel Adoxa moschatellina, and Frosted Orache Atriplex laciniata. It’s very much a mixed bag.

The overall average number of species recorded per square in the conurbation now sits at 135 – perhaps closer to 140 when you exclude partial squares dominated by neighbouring vice-counties or open water. That’s a little lower than I’d like, and it suggests that certain species are still being missed in some areas. For that reason, the remainder of this year – and possibly early 2026 – will be spent ‘topping up’ the less-visited squares.

Some New Neophytes

One of the most surprising aspects of the survey so far is that, even after three years of intensive recording (including contributions from botanists dating back to 2018), new species continue to appear all the time. There are quite a few, in fact. Recent additions include a young Japanese Shield-fern Polystichum polyblepharum growing on a muddy ledge in Jesmond Dene, Yellow Oxeye Buphthalmum speciosum invading grassland at Big Waters, and Wall Persicaria Persicaria capitata colonising masonry in North Shields. Others include Yellow Nonea Nonea lutea on waste ground in Shieldfield, and Warty Barberry Berberis verruculosa seeding itself from historic plantings in Jesmond Dene.

Some interesting new natives have also come to light since my last update – proof that there are still surprises to be found across the conurbation. These include Great Yellow-cress Rorippa amphibia, Ivy-leaved Crowfoot Ranunculus hederaceus, and Blinks Montia fontana.

Clearly, there’s still plenty left to discover on urban Tyneside.

Are Newcastle and North Tyneside unique?

While the number of species recorded in the conurbation is notable – particularly the high proportion of neophytes – I’m not convinced that Newcastle is especially unique on a national scale. Were similar studies carried out in other urban areas of the UK, I suspect the results would be broadly comparable. That said, a few factors do appear to have an outsized impact on the plant diversity observed here. These include:

1. A wealth of industrial and reclaimed land with their associated disturbed and modified habitats
Some of the most diverse sites in the area are those with a history of industrial activity. These landscapes, shaped by extraction, dumping, or redevelopment, have contributed many notable finds. Key examples include Dune Helleborine Epipactis dunensis and Common Wintergreen Pyrola minor.

2. The tidal nature of the River Tyne and remnants of coastal habitats
Though perhaps less significant overall, the tidal stretch of the Tyne and small pockets of relic coastal habitat have introduced a range of halophytes that are absent from inland salted roads. Noteworthy species here include Prickly Saltwort Salsola kali, Sea-rocket Cakile maritima, Sea Couch Elymus athericus, and Sea Arrow-grass Triglochin maritima.

3. The persistence of other relic habitats in the urban landscape
Despite their often degraded state, the conurbation’s older woodlands and fragmented heathland patches continue to support species typically absent from urban settings. Among them are Sanicle Sanicula europaea, Heath Rush Juncus squarrosus, and Common Cottongrass Eriophorum angustifolium.

4. The presence of Victorian-era wooded parks
Several of the city’s older parks, particularly Jesmond Dene, were originally managed in a naturalistic style and now managed as semi-natural settings. Jesmond Dene alone accounts for many of the more unusual records to date and though largely overtaken by native vegetation, it still supports an impressive list of exotics persisting or in many cases, reproducing. These include Gagnepain’s Barberry Berberis gagnepainii, Blue Anemone Anemone apennina, Shallon Gaultheria shallon, and Autumn Fern Dryopteris erythrosora.

5. Bird seed aliens within the urban flora
Less influential than the factors above but still noteworthy, at least 26 species recorded in the area are likely introductions via bird seed. This includes common escapees like Sunflower Helianthus annuus, as well as more surprising records such as Chia Salvia hispanica and Common Amaranth Amaranthus retroflexus.

    Some Missing Plants

    Part of the fun of a project such as this is the opportunity to ‘chase down’ older recorders supplied by botanists in the area. Doing so has resulted in success in many instances but occasionally, the plant in question is not re-found. So far, around 40 plants have been listed as ‘missing’ from the conurbation.

    Among these species are a few that were undoubtedly ephemeral in nature – Garden Anchuza Anchusa azurea and Winter Savory Satureja montana – while others have clearly been lost due to changes in the landscape. This appears to be the case for rarities in Deadly Nightshade Atropa belladonna, Ivy Broomrape Orobanche hederae and perhaps even Wood Millet Milium effusum which despite several searches, I cannot find in any of our older woods. A few more plants are more annoying in that they “should” be out there somewhere. I’m looking at you Grass Vetchling Lathyrus nissolia and Little Mouse-ear Cerastium semidecandrum.

    Most Abundant Plants

    As you might expect, over the course of the survey, certain plants have proven to be far more abundant across the conurbation than others. As is the case elsewhere in the UK, these tend to be adaptable generalists or species with clever strategies for seed dispersal.

    Just for fun, the table below shows the twenty most frequently recorded species so far. I doubt there’ll be many surprises and suspect many of these will in fact occur in every square.

    SpeciesPercentage Coverage
    Annual Meadow-grass Poa annua98.4%
    Bramble Rubus fruticosus agg.98.4%
    Sycamore Acer pseudoplatanus97.4%
    Daisy Bellis perennis97.4%
    Cock’s-foot Dactylis glomerata97.4%
    Ribwort Plantain Plantago lanceolata96.8%
    Nettle Urtica diocia95.8%
    Creeping Thistle Cirsium arvense95.3%
    Yarrow Achillea millefolium95.8%
    Broad-leaved Dock Rumex obtusifolius94.7%
    Smooth Sow-thistle Sonchus oleraceus94.2%
    Dandelion Taraxacum agg.93.7%
    Common Ragwort Jacobaea vulgaris93.2%
    Cleavers Galium aparine92.6%
    Cow Parsley Anthriscus sylvestris93.7%
    Groundsel Senecio vulgaris90.5%
    Wood Avens Geum urbanum90.0%
    Hawthorn Crataegus monogyna90.0%
    Elder Sambucus nigra90.0%
    Greater Plantain Plantago major89.5%

    Most Diverse Sites

    Totting up the most diverse squares in the conurbation has been an interesting task. By large, the squares with the highest species diversity typically feature a wide range of habitats including large areas of relatively undeveloped land such as nature reserves or public parks.

    The twelve squares with the greatest species diversity are listed below.

    NameGrid RefSpecies Count
    Gosforth Nature ReserveNZ2570277
    Lower Ouseburn ValleyNZ2664276
    Iris BrickfieldNZ2766268
    Heaton ParkNZ2665260
    Havannah (East)NZ2271257
    Jesmond DeneNZ2666249
    Scotswood GardenNZ2064232
    Silverlink ParkNZ3170245
    Little WatersNZ2373240
    BenwellNZ2163231
    Leazes ParkNZ2464221
    Great Park (South)NZ2270218

    Except for Gosforth Nature Reserve, which is predominantly natural in its composition, all of these squares contain a mix of relic natural or reclaimed land and urbanisation. Eleven out of twelve of these also contain wetland ecosystems of varying sizes, ranging from small ornamental ponds to lakes and minor rivers.

    Plan of Attack

    And there we have it – a brief update on the Urban Flora. We’re into the final stretch now, with surveying likely to wrap up by early 2026. Had others not joined in, I suspect I’d be at this much longer!

    All that remains is to finish writing the darn thing and turn it into a book. With [very] little disposable income to fund this, I’ll need to be smart about how I go about it but I’ve got a few ideas for grants and free publishing avenues to follow up on in due course.

    All that’s left is to say a massive thank you to everyone who’s helped so far whether directly, by sharing records or joining field visits, or indirectly through support and encouragement. There are many of you, and with support not always forthcoming from the places you might expect, your involvement has meant a great deal. Onwards…

    Signs of Spring in the Tyne Valley

    The snowdrops and crocuses that defined late winter’s botanical outings have now faded, and, as if by magic, a new wave of plants is rising to the fore in the local landscape. About time too—I, for one, needed shaking out of the winter doldrums…

    Yesterday, Matt and I were lucky to have a rare coinciding day off, so we headed west up the Tyne Valley. Stopping at Watersmeet, Letah Wood, and Bywell, it was wonderful to see just how much the season had advanced since our last visit. Cue some much-needed spring colour!

    The highlight of the day was discovering one of my all-time favourite plants—the Yellow Star-of-Bethlehem (Gagea lutea). This charming bulbous perennial boasts golden-yellow, star-like flowers that are sure to lift your spirits on a chilly March day. It thrives in woodlands with basic soils and, as its distribution map shows, is quite a localised species in the UK.

    In the North East, it’s restricted to just a handful of high-quality sites. Watersmeet is one of them, and during our visit, we were thrilled to find a large population in full bloom.

    Also at Watersmeet, it was lovely to see some of our more familiar woodland plants springing to life. Leading the way were our first Wood Anemone (Anemone nemorosa) and Moschatel (Adoxa moschatellina) flowers of the year. The latter’s genus name, Adoxa, reflects its inconspicuous nature and unassuming growth, while Moschatellina is derived from the Italian moscato, meaning musk.

    Other interesting finds at Watersmeet included Opposite-leaved Golden Saxifrage, Monk’s-hood, Sanicle, Creeping Comfrey, and Leopard’s-bane. But before long, another pit stop beckoned…

    Believed to be Northumberland’s last remaining Wild Daffodil wood, Letah Wood near Hexham is a breathtaking sight—if you time it right. Unfortunately, we were a little early, with most of the Wild Daffodils (Narcissus pseudonarcissus subsp. pseudonarcissus) just beginning to open. Still, in the sunnier clearings, we managed to find a few in bloom…

    Daffodils can be tricky to tell apart, but our native variety is far more delicate than the hulking, luminescent specimens commonly planted in gardens. It’s a relatively small plant, with pale yellow tepals that are noticeably creamier in tone than its vibrant yellow ‘trumpet.’ These tepals usually tilt forward, as shown in the picture below. The true species also tends to have shorter stems and smaller flowers than the hybrids bred from it.

    he final leg of our trip took us to Bywell, where the impressive carpets of Snowdrops and Winter Aconite had given way to a fresh wave of spring species. One of the most striking was Forbe’s Glory-of-the-snow (Scilla forbesii), which was widespread along the sandy riverbanks—perhaps having escaped from nearby churchyards. This species boasts distinctive two-toned flowers: blue on the outside with a white centre, and a petal tube that noticeably broadens from the flower stalk.

    Another Scilla species was also evident at Bywell—Siberian Squill (Scilla siberica). This one is a true gem, with vivid blue, nodding flowers. It tends to occur as a naturalised relic of cultivation, often found where it was originally introduced in churchyards, parks, and large gardens. It’s rather beautiful, I hope you’ll agree.

    Snowdrop Identification Simplified

    Get started identifying cultivated and wild Snowdrops with a new snowdrop identification crib for gardeners and budding galanthophiles

    It’s no secret that I love Snowdrops – growing them, finding them in the wild, and visiting collections have all proven rather addictive. Like many enthusiasts, I often struggle with identification – something I suspect is common, except among the most knowledgeable Galanthophiles. This challenge is partly due to the scattered nature of Snowdrop resources.

    Having created a simplified key for widespread Snowdrop species found in the UK, I wanted to take it a step further by extending it to cultivated species and hybrids. Here is the result. Perhaps it will be useful to fellow gardeners who, like me, frequently misplace their labels!

    Identifying Snowdrops

    Well-naturalised in woodlands, hedgerows, large gardens, and other shady areas, snowdrops bring joy to many in late winter. Looking past the obvious similarities, they can be an interesting bunch to explore, and even with a tentative glance, it is possible to find several species with relative ease.

    On top of this, the popularity of Snowdrops with collectors means that a great many species, most of which hail from Eastern Europe, have been brought into cultivation. Many of these are rather rare but several do crop up from time to time, as do hybrids. Cultivars are plentiful too but are not covered here (with a few exceptions). A good list can be found here.

    References

    ZUBOV, D.A. and DAVIS, A.P. (2012). Galanthus panjutinii sp. nov.: a new name for an invalidly published species of Galanthus (Amaryllidaceae) from the northern Colchis area of Western Transcaucasia. Phytotaxa, [online] 50(1), p.55. doi:https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.50.1.5.

    Myspecies.info. (2025). Galanthus alpinus [Sosn. ]. [online] Available at: https://citesbulbs.myspecies.info/category/galanthus-wild-species/galanthus-alpinus [Accessed 13 Mar. 2025].

    Snowdropwiki.nl. (2016). Galanthus genus – Snowdrop Wiki. [online] Available at: https://www.snowdropwiki.nl/Snowdrop_Wiki/galanthus-genus/ [Accessed 13 Mar. 2025].

    Galanthus.co.uk. (2025). Galanthus: Home. [online] Available at: https://www.galanthus.co.uk/ [Accessed 13 Mar. 2025].

    Lord Armstrong and the Exotic Plants of Jesmond Dene

    Jesmond Dene, nestled just two miles northeast of Newcastle city centre, is a true gem. With the River Ouse Burn at its heart, this picturesque area has witnessed remarkable transformations over the centuries. What began as a stretch of natural woodland evolved into an industrial hub, dotted with mills, before transitioning into a Victorian pleasure ground. Today, it stands as a cherished public park. While the dene’s history is rich and multifaceted—a story explored in depth elsewhere—it is its stint as a private estate that intrigues this curious botanist most of all.

    Strolling through the overgrown dene today, one can’t help but marvel at the sheer diversity of plant life thriving here. Native woodland species, exotic ornamentals, garden escapes, and beloved Victorian classics all grow in abundance and truth be told, it is quite the puzzle to unravel how and when many of these fascinating botanicals arrived. In this post, we’ll attempt to do just that—exploring some of Jesmond Dene’s hidden botanical treasures and, at times speculatively, attempting to trace their origins. Let’s dive in…

    Lord Armstrong’s Private Garden

    While best known for his renowned residence at Cragside, Sir William George Armstrong (1810–1900) also left an indelible mark on Newcastle through his landscaping and development of Jesmond Dene. Born in Shieldfield, Newcastle, and originally trained as a solicitor, Armstrong married Margaret Ramshaw (1807–1893) of Bishop Auckland, County Durham, in 1835. That same year, the couple built their home, Jesmond Dean, on a small portion of land that would later become part of the larger dene.

    Over the following decades, particularly in the 1850s, Armstrong and his wife purchased large tracts of neighbouring land, gradually transforming the dene into a meticulously landscaped parkland. Armstrong’s alterations were ambitious and wide-ranging. Fascinated by water, he reshaped the River Ouse Burn by adding waterfalls, islands, and bridges, many of which remain iconic features of the area today. He also introduced a network of footpaths, still enjoyed by modern day walkers.

    Equally significant, though perhaps less obvious, was his transformation of the dene’s flora. Armstrong imported plants from across the globe, enriching the landscape with exotic species and curious varieties, in doing so, greatly altering the park’s character.

    A view of Jesmond Dene c1890 courtesy of Newcastle City Libraries

    Armstrong’s passion for plants was well-documented, and, in keeping with the times, many of the species he introduced to his ‘woodland garden’ reflected the trends of Victorian landscaping. Rhododendrons (Rhododendron ponticum) were a particularly popular choice, as was Aucuba (Aucuba japonica), along with an array of exotic trees. Some of these, including impressive specimens of Wellingtonia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) and Japanese Red Cedar (Cryptomeria japonica), still stand tall today. Look closer, and you’ll also find several unusual oaks, such as the Red Oak (Quercus rubra) and Lebanon Oak (Quercus libani). However, while these relics are striking, they are not the focus of this post.

    In 1883, Lord Armstrong gifted the main area of Jesmond Dene to the Corporation of Newcastle upon Tyne for the benefit of its citizens. The following year, in 1884, the park was officially opened by the Prince and Princess of Wales. Since then, little has changed. Jesmond Dene remains well-used by locals but, aside from essential maintenance and a few successive introductions of equally unusual plants, it has been largely untended for over a century, allowing nature to reclaim much of the space – the very reason it is so difficult to tell new introductions from older ones!

    Today, while still officially recognisd as a park, Jesmond Dene resembles more of a semi-natural urban woodland. It supports many species typical of ancient semi-natural woodlands, such as Wood Anemone (Anemone nemorosa) and Ramsons (Allium ursinum) and its canopy is dominated by native trees, including English Oak (Quercus robur), Wych Elm (Ulmus glabra) and Ash (Fraxinus excelsior). This façade of naturalness is so extensive that parts of the dene appear entirely wild. Yet, while many of the landscaped features remain— complete with their exotic introductions —much of Lord Armstrong’s original planting seems to have been lost to time. Or has it?

    A view of Jesmond Dene c1910 courtesy of Newcastle City Libraries
    A view of the bridge, Jesmond Dene, c1910 courtesy of Newcastle City Libraries

    Over recent years, while exploring Jesmond Dene, I have stumbled across several remnants of its past life as a naturalistic garden — often in the most unexpected places. While some species have undoubtedly been lost, much still remains for those who know where to look. Though not strictly “wild” (although one could argue that any species persisting or spreading for over a century has earned that distinction), these exotic plants add an intriguing layer of interest to what is already the crown jewel of Newcastle’s green spaces.

    In what will likely become a rather lengthy blog, I wanted to highlight some of these botanical relics…

    The Exotic Plants of Jesmond Dene

    Before going any further, please do take a look at this superb account published account on the History of Jesmond Dene. With mention of many of the plants introduced during Victorian times, this will form the basis for several of today’s assumptions.

    Shrubs in Jesmond Dene

    Perhaps the most obvious aspect of Armstrong’s legacy is the assortment of exotic trees scattered throughout Jesmond Dene and the neighbouring Armstrong Park. While undeniably fascinating, these trees are rather conspicuous and not the focus of this blog (though I have written about some of them previously here).

    Far less prominent are the shrubs introduced as understory plants and hedging. Several exotic species, such as Rhododendron (Rhododendron ponticum), Snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus), and Himalayan Honeysuckle (Leycesteria formosa), are widespread — so much so that it’s nearly impossible to miss them. Others, like Aucuba (Aucuba japonica), which forms large stands around Pet’s Corner and in Armstrong Park, and both Wilson’s Honeysuckle (Lonicera nitida) and Box-leaved Honeysuckle (Lonicera pileata), are easier to spot if you know where to look.

    Even more intriguing are those shrubs that have blended seamlessly with the naturally occurring vegetation. Take the Berberis family for example — a spiny set of shrubs typically originating from Asia or South America. In a summary of plants recorded in Jesmond Dene in 1894, only two species are mentioned: Oregon-grape (Berberis aquifolium) and Darwin’s Barberry (Berberis darwinii), the latter, of course, named in honour of Charles Darwin.

    While the original plantings of Oregon-grape appear to have disappeared, the species is still very much present in the Dene today and seedlings can readily be found in several parts. Whether these stem from Armstrong’s introductions, or more recent plantings in the 1980’s and 90’s remains to be seen. Darwin’s Barberry persists in several locations too, most notably near Castle Farm Road. Beyond these, other Berberis species seem to have quietly flown under the radar. For instance, several stands of the attractive Chinese Barberry (Berberis julianae) can be found, especially near the entrance to Armstrong Park, while Common Barberry (Berberis vulgaris) has been noted in the upper reaches of the dene. The origins of both are hazy at best.

    More recently, specimens of Gagnepain’s Barberry (Berberis gagnepainii) were observed near the quarry (rail.hired.silks) where one can also find some nice examples of Warty Barberry (Berberis verruculosa), both plants absent from early records. Both of these seem to be later introductions by park custodians. The same can also be said for the fragrant Christmas Box (Sarcococca confusa) growing nearby – not a Berberis but a nice plant nonetheless.

    Other groups of plants mentioned in early accounts of Jesmond Dene include Hawthorns and Cotoneasters. Starting with the Hawthorns, the 1894 plant list references Crataegus oxycantha — a now obsolete name that broadly encompassed both Common Hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna) and Midland Hawthorn (Crataegus laevigata). While plenty of native Common Hawthorn thrives throughout the dene, visitors can still find examples of Midland Hawthorn hidden in plain sight, particularly in the grotto and along Red Walk. Though they appear quite similar to the untrained eye, these Midland Hawthorns were surely part of Armstrong’s original introductions.

    Midland Hawthorn (Crataegus laevigata) © Pru Hamed

    But what about the Cotoneasters? Given their ability to spread independently, several species found in Jesmond Dene may have colonised the area more recently. Among these are Willow-leaved Cotoneaster (Cotoneaster salicifolius) and Himalayan Cotoneaster (Cotoneaster simonsii). Far more intriguing, however, is the presence of Purple-flowered Cotoneaster (Cotoneaster atropurpureus), observed growing within the riverside masonry along Red Walk. This species has not been recorded elsewhere in the region, and given its apparent age, it may well originate from original plantings in the dene.

    Jesmond Dene is home to many other exotic shrubs, nestled discreetly within the landscape. Among the more striking species are Yellow Azalea (Rhododendron luteum), hidden in the thickets west of Paddy Freeman’s Park (punchy.wins.usage), and Wrinkled Viburnum (Viburnum rhytidophyllum), found nearby at stuck.lamp.soak. The former is mentioned in early accounts, while older examples of the latter must surely stem from Armstrong’s day. Recent records also suggest the presence of the related Laurustinus (Viburnum tinus), though, alas, I have yet to locate it myself.

    Three other shrubs I have observed, however, are Juneberry (Amelanchier spp.), Asian Firethorn (Pyracantha rogersiana) and Shallon (Gaultheria shallon). Interestingly, the latter has become a problematic invasive species at Armstrong’s other residence at Cragside. In Jesmond Dene, you can find Shallon uphill from solo.shack.feels. Along Red Walk, you may also spot examples of Weigela (Weigela florida), Mock Orange (Philadelphus coronarius), and Rose-of-Sharon (Hypericum calycinum), all of which have presumably stood the test of time. All three are mentioned in that historic account of the denes flora.

    Whilst not strictly a shrub (though large than most) also worth a look on your next walk along the Ouse Burn are the large stands of bamboo. The most impressive sit in Armstrong Park and after much mind-changing, I think these could be Arrow Bamboo (Pseudosasa japonica). This would fit with the initial planting plan.

    Three final species worth mentioning are all Rubus species, or brambles. First, across the Ouse Burn from Pet’s Corner, a spring visit may reward visitors with the striking pink blooms of Salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), a North American species that is now happily naturalising at colleague.darker.pines, or thereabouts. This was a popular plant in Victorian times and in the North East, appears most frequently in the grounds of older stately homes.

    At several points in the dene, you can also spot sprawling patches of Chinese Bramble (Rubus tricolor), a species long favored in landscaping. Given Armstrong’s fondness for oriental plants, this may date back to Victorian times. Finally, at mercy.lend.spray, you will find a long-neglected garden completely overtaken by White-stemmed Bramble (Rubus cockburnianus), a particularly attractive species endemic to China. Given the vast area it occupies, it’s clear that this bramble has been established for quite some time but for how long exactly, I am unsure.

    Groundcover

    Of course, when planting a whole host of trees and shrubs, you need something pretty to sit under them. The Armstrong’s planted many such things including several Gentians, Heaths and orchids now lost to time. That said, if anyone stumbles across a Lady’s-slipper Orchid, please let me know – supposedly these too were introduced on mass!

    What remains today of Armstrong’s planted groundcover largely consists of tenacious, hardy species. Throughout the dene, you’ll encounter both Greater Periwinkle (Vinca major) and Lesser Periwinkle (Vinca minor) in various areas, as well as Atlantic Ivy (Hedera hibernica) and Persian Ivy (Hedera colchica) adorning the woodland floor in several spots. It’s perhaps unsurprising that these species have persisted, but look closer, and you’ll also find surprises.

    One such surprise is a sprawling colony of Abraham-Isaac-Jacob (Trachystemon orientalis) at slot.puff.stale. This unusual plant, native to Bulgaria and surrounding regions, is well-established in the dene and must surely have been introduced as a botanical curiosity. It is no longer common in cultivation today and would be a very odd choice indeed for modern park keepers given its tendency to overtake neighbouring areas.

    Abraham-Isaac-Jacob © Chris Barlow

    Similarly, while walking along Red Walk, it’s possible to see several Asiatic plants growing amid tangles of brambles and other native weeds. Rodgersia (Rodgersia podophylla) is present here, as is Japanese Astilbe (Astilbe japonica), while in some areas, particularly on some of the higher more remote slopes, stands of Carpet-box (Pachysandra terminalis) can also be observed. The isolation of these sporadic plants, far from tended beds, suggests that they too could have been present here for quite some time. Conversations with park custodians seem to support this idea though it is difficult to know for certain given the successive plantings undertaken over the years.

    The above curiosities are not the only ones worth mentioning. By the stepping stones at face.edgy.sticky, a glance at the sodden, moss-covered banks of the Ouse Burn should reveal another fascinating plant: Kidney Saxifrage (Saxifraga hirsuta). This perennial thrives in high humidity and is typically found in damp, shaded environments such as woods, ravines, and north-facing cliffs. It was likely introduced as a rockery plant and has since established itself in several areas of the dene, alongside another similar species, Londonpride (Saxifraga × urbium). Interestingly, an intermediate form of the two species also exists in the dene and may represent a hybrid—a subject worth investigating in the future.

    Another species present in the dene, Fringecups (Tellima grandiflora), would also fit with this style of Victorian planting but is now so well naturalised in parts of our region that tracing its origin becomes incredibly challenging.

    Last, but by no means least, Jesmond Dene’s ferns deserve mention. The dene hosts several native species, including Hard Fern (Blechnum spicant) and Lady-fern (Athyrium filix-femina), but it also features introduced varieties. At the site of an old fernery, presumably created by the Armstrong’s, nature has reclaimed much of the area, yet the wider area still holds intriguing plants like Copper Shield-fern (Dryopteris erythrosora). Whether this species is an descendant of original plantings or of something planted more recently is impossible to assess. It is a pretty one though and I’d like to think it may have stood the test of time.

    Elsewhere in the dene, you’ll notice many examples of Soft Shield-fern (Polystichum setiferum). While this species is native to southern parts of the UK, in the North it generally appears as an introduced plant. Interestingly, it is one of the few ferns specifically mentioned in Armstrong’s original planting plans. Over the years, it has gone on to colonise many parts of the dene.

    Spring Bulbs

    Another rather charming group of plants worth mentioning are the spring bulbs, valued today just as they were in Victorian times for their colorful early-season displays. While records are sparse regarding exactly what was introduced to the dene during Armstrong’s time, early accounts do mention “squills, crocuses, and similar plants,” which were added for their visual appeal. Some of these plantings still persist today.

    At cycle.erase.calm, or nearby, a stroll later in the year should reveal some attractive stands of Autumn Crocus (Colchicum autumnale), while a springtime visit will uncover patches of Green Snowdrop (Galanthus woronowii) now well at home in the woodland. In various parts of the dene, Spring Crocus (Crocus vernus) and Early Crocus (Crocus tommasinianus) can also be found. The most impressive colony of the latter grows near the entrance to Armstrong Park, where the species appears to have become well-established.

    Scattered patches of Common Snowdrop (Galanthus nivalis) and Greater Snowdrop (Galanthus elwesii) too may also trace their origins to the dene’s Victorian plantings but we cannot know for sure.

    Green Snowdrop (Galanthus woronowii) © James Common

    The squills mentioned in those early accounts have all but disappeared, with one notable exception: a small population of Siberian Squill (Scilla siberica) in Armstrong Park. Its vivid blue flowers make for a striking and unusual sight amidst the site’s native woodland flora. Records from 2003 also note the presence of this species in the northern part of the dene.

    Two more striking species are also worth highlighting. At video.stole.counts, visitors can find a small population of Dog’s-tooth Violet (Erythronium dens-canis). First recorded here in 2004 (although known about for much longer), its origins remain unclear, though it could be remnant of the park’s early tenure as a garden. Not far away, at being.many.horns, scattered examples of Blue Anemone (Anemone blanda) grow alongside our native Wood Anemone (Anemone nemorosa). The positioning of both species suggests they are not recent additions but rather remnants of historical plantings, perhaps in Armstrong’s day, perhaps more recently.

    And there we have it—a tour of Jesmond Dene’s exotic plant life. In truth, aside from the rhododendrons, laurels, yews, and bamboos, it is difficult to say with certainty whether any of the fascinating exotics present in the dene can definitively be traced back to Lord Armstrong. I’d have loved to offer a more conclusive answer, but then again, who doesn’t enjoy a good mystery?

    One thing is certain, however: Jesmond Dene is entirely unique on a local level. It is part woodland, showcasing countless examples of our native flora, and part garden, adorned with an array of exotic plants. This rare blend makes it an endlessly intriguing place to explore, and I sincerely hope it continues to be maintained in this spirit for generations to come.

    Finally, it’s worth noting that new discoveries are still being made in the dene—or, at the very least, old treasures are being rediscovered. So don’t be surprised if, on your next walk, you stumble across something altogether unexpected, quietly tucked away in a thicket.

    Wildflowers in Winter: The New Year Plant Hunt 2025

    As is customary at year’s end, much of my time over the last week was spent darting about the local area plant hunting as part of the BSBI’s New Year Plant Hunt. Now in its fourteenth year, this fantastic citizen science project not only provides valuable data about how our flora is coping in the face of changing weather patterns but also provides the perfect excuse to head out botanising at time when most people simply wouldn’t.

    With one solo hunt under my belt and two fantastic group events led for BSBI and Natural History Society of Northumbria members, now seemed like a good time to recap what has been an incredibly productive couple of days.

    North Shields

    Saving the routine NYPH routes for the upcoming group walks, on 29 December I thought I would head somewhere different, opting for a short metro journey to North Shields for a poke about the various industrial plots fringing the Tyne in its final stages. I’m glad I did with no less than 55 species recorded in flower – a high total for the chilly North East in late December.

    Many of the plants seen were those you would expect in winter, among these ubiquitous species such as Daisy (Bellis perennis), Dandelion (Taraxacum agg), Ivy (Hedera helix) and Gorse (Ulex europeaus). The commonplace aliens put on a good show too with Oxford Ragwort (Senecio squalidus) blooming in pavement cracks, Canadian Fleabane (Erigeron canadensis) about neglected gardens and Water Bent (Polypogon viridis) along the margins of several main roads. There were, however, more unexpected finds to be had too. For example, a south-facing bank in the centre of town produced an unusual double act of Viper’s-bugloss (Echium vulgare) and White Campion (Silene latifolia), the former typically a plant of mid-summer, and the grassland abutting Meadow Well metro station a very early example of Cowslip (Primula veris).

    The ponds in North Shield’s ‘Linear Park’ also proved worth a gander with both Marsh Marigold (Caltha palustris) and Monkeyflower (Erythranthe guttata) hanging on and later in the survey, Wild Parsnip (Pastinaca sativa subsp. sylvestris) was encountered on an area of derelict land at Royal Quays. A good start I’d say…

    St. Peter’s Basin

    On 30 December, the time came for the first of this year’s group hunts and meeting with NHSN members in the east of Newcastle, we set about exploring a wide range of habitats including cycleways, ballast hills, marina pavements and even the unceremonious outskirts of the local tip. All proved fruitful with 59 species noted in bloom.

    The common and familiar plants once again dominated proceedings but here too there were plenty of interesting discoveries. Around the industrial units, Narrow-leaved Ragwort (Senecio inaequidens) and Guernsey Fleabane (Erigeron sumatrensis) proved plentiful and a stretch of verge outside the tip held blooming Field Madder (Sherardia arvensis), Medium-flowered Winter-cress (Barbarea intermedia) and Green Field-speedwell (Veronica agrestis). Nearby, the margins of Hadrian’s Cycleway held Balkan Spurge (Euphorbia oblongata) and Atlantic Ivy (Hedera hibernica) and around nearby residences, Pale Pink-sorrel (Oxalis incarnata) and Eastern Rocket (Sisymbrium orientale) were still going strong.

    Perhaps the greatest surprise of the day came in the form of a solitary example of Broad-leaved Willowherb (Epilobium montanum) blooming in a sheltered spot at the base of a garden wall. This is a species typically encountered in flower during July and August, and a very queer sight during the winter months.

    Heaton

    On 1 January, the time came for a re-run of a NYPH route surveyed in most of the last five years. Taking to the streets of Heaton with a wonderful group in toe (including the fab Charlotte Rankin), pickings were somewhat slimmer with 43 species observed. Here, a mosey around a nearby park provided Hazel (Corylus avellana) and some delightfully neglected gardens a suite of more unusual species in Barren Brome (Anisantha sterilis), Mind-your-own-business (Soleirolia soleirolii) and Snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus).

    In Heaton Park, both Snowdrop (Galanthus nivalis) and Early Crocus (Crocus tommasinianus) put in an appearance, the former almost a month earlier than in 2024, and Wavy Bitter-cress (Cardamine flexuosa) was a nice find from a member of the group nestled amid flowering patches of the far commoner (at least in urban settings) Hairy Bitter-cress (Cardamine hirsuta).

    Exploring North East Nature in 2024

    It has become a bit of a tradition on this blog to share a round-up of the previous year’s highlights, discoveries and memorable moments. Indeed, it is always nice to look back and reflect, and nicer still to revisit similar posts from 2015 onwards (even if I do cringe a bit at my writing back then). As 2024 draws to a close, lets go again with some highlights of the past 12 months, both here on Common by Nature and across the wider North East.

    As ever, a massive thank you to the friends, colleagues, naturalists and likeminded locals who have helped make 2024 another enjoyable and productive year. The natural history community is a thing of beauty and I am so very grateful for the advice, support and nuggets of wisdom offered once again!

    Recording the Urban Flora

    This one won’t surprise you – I’ve harped on about urban plants several times on this blog in 2024 [try here and here]. As many of you know, the vast majority of my time outside of work this year has been spend recording and writing an Urban Flora for Newcastle and North Tyneside – something I hope to finally bring to fruition in 2025.

    This year alone, I have visited over 100 monads in the city, logged some 17,000 plant records and noted no less than 800 species growing in a wild and naturalised state among the terraces, alleyways and brownfield plots of Tyneside. Still, after several years of recording, it never ceases to amaze me just how diverse our cities actually are. From relic native plants such as Lesser Water-parsnip thriving in an urban burn and Autumn Gentian colonising a former spoil heap to hardy invaders, there is ever so much to see. Indeed, the total count for the survey area now stands at 1,020 species – that’s a fair chunk of the British flora!

    A project like this would not be possible without the support of others so a huge thank you to everyone who has shared a record on iRecord this year. Particularly to Chris Barlow and James Bowyer for their helpful surveys.

    Special Places

    The same places crop up time and time again in these roundups; though that is not necessarily a bad thing. We all have our favourites and for me, 2024 provided opportunities to gain a deeper understanding of the the two that matter most to me: Lindisfarne and Upper Teesdale.

    I have visited Lindisfarne on no less than seven occasions this year, alone, with friends, with groups, you name it. Still, there has been an awful lot of of new spectacles to enjoy. Inspired by the Metherell’s superb book, Small Adder’s-tongue (Ophioglossum azoricum) finally revealed itself and at last, I made time to seek out the vice-county’s only example of Common Sea-lavender (Limonium vulgare). Add to that my first encounter with the island’s Coralroot Orchids (Corallorhiza trifida) and record counts of Frog Orchid (Dactylorhiza viridis) and you have the makings of a very happy botanist.

    Teesdale too has been a enjoy, with careful scouring finally revealing Moonwort (Botrychium lunaria) and Shady Horsetail (Equisetum pratense). Of course, fantastic displays of Spring Gentians (Gentiana verna) were not to be scoffed at too.

    Away from these places, there have been exciting excursions to Hadrian’s Wall in search of Waxcaps, Hareshaw Linn for ferns, and many, many more wonderful outings. I have been spoiled.

    Fantastic people and Events

    If there is one part of my ‘day job’ I love best, it is the opportunity to get out and about sharing natural history with others. This year, I have had the pleasure of leading some 80 sessions across the North East, visiting some wonderful places with many inspiring people.

    The highlight this year has definitely been the education courses, including my new ‘Botanist’s Year’ programme delivered for NHSN which saw almost 20 visits to botanical hotspots across the region and covered everything from snowdrops and cotoneasters to willowherbs and pesky yellow composites. I am not sure about the attendees, but I had a blast. Add to this our 200 Plants and Counting Course, returning Urban Botany course and standalone sessions on grasses, trees and even a few insects, and 2024 has been a pretty productive year. I definitely feel more confident in this regard – had you known me a few years past, you would know this hasn’t always been the case.

    Closer to home, NHSN’s super Gosforth’s Wild Web project has meant plenty of walks, talks and ID sessions in urban parts of Newcastle. I’ve particularly enjoyed spending time with the Friends of Hebburn Riverside Park and several bioblitzes held in Newcastle’s city parks. Truly, there is no such thing as a dull day at the office…

    interesting Plants

    As you might expect, most of this year’s interesting discoveries have taken place in and around the city. Still, there have been several and some of them at least were rather notable. Rummaging this year has revealed a good few ‘county firsts’ in the form of Egyptian Clover (Trifolium alexandrinum), Japanese Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), Chia (Salvia hispanica), Lawn Lobelia (Pratia angulata), False Buck’s-beard (Astilbe japonica) and several more.

    Away from the dodgy aliens, it was exciting to note Lesser Water-parsnip (Berula erecta) at Seaton Burn, a plant once thought extinct in VC67, and new populations of Rare Plant Register and local scarcities such as Autumn Gentian (Gentianella amarella), Common Wintergreen (Pyrola minor), and Rustyback (Asplenium ceterach).

    All of this goes without mentioning the botanical ‘twitches’ that have taken place in 2024. Especially memorable are encounters with Lady Claremont’s Spleenwort (Asplenium x clermontiae) and Lobed Maidenhair Spleenwort (Asplenium trichomanes subsp. pachyrachis) but there have been many.

    Rediscovering this Blog

    This blog has changed much since it launched in 2011. Where once it was a journal of sorts it has now become a repository for any random thought that pops into my head – identification sheets, project updates, trip reports, exciting finds, you name it. My writing here had waned somewhat over recent years but this year, it seems to have made somewhat of a resurgence. Mainly because a good few people keep reading it!

    Though it beggars belief, this year, Common By Nature has been visited some 42,000 times (a 200% increase on last year) by around 34,000 individual visitors. While it is true that I have put a little more effort in, I am not entirely sure what has caused this. I still giggle that a post I published in 2022 on ‘The Best Plant ID Apps‘ continues to draw in around 100 readers per day.

    I guess what I am trying to say is thank you for reading!

    Down the Rabbit Hole

    As someone with ASD, I confess that I am prone to heading down rabbit holes from time to time. Usually, these forays last for a few weeks before dissipating, never to emerge again. Recently however, a few of these deep dives appear to be sticking and may even become a key focus in the future.

    On a light note, one of these ‘fads’ seems to have become snowdrops! Besides an obligatory glance each spring, these plants seldom got a look in before but now, seem to have become somewhat of a seasonal obsession. So much so that our tiny yarden in Heaton is now home over a dozen species and several more cultivars won in hard fought eBay auctions. This has since resulted in a great many hours spent combing the wider countryside in search of new or unrecorded species and in some cases, unique varieties. Just look at the wonderful yellow one below…

    On a more serious [and far more stressful] note, I seem to have also stuck with Cotoneasters. Why, I am not sure, likely my husband would prefer it if I hadn’t given how many weekends this year have been spent searching for and identifying them – sometimes successfully. Regardless, I do love them and recently shared a concise atlas for the species found growing wild on Tyneside.

    Rumour has it I’ll also be talking about them to BSBI members in a few months time…

    Looking Ahead

    It is always nice to set a few resolutions for the New Year, and to publish them here so i can be held accountable when inevitably, some of them fail to come to fruition. That said, in 2025 I do have a few aspirations…

    • Finish the urban flora! With around 50 ‘top up’ surveys still to complete, much of next year will be spent exploring our urban plants. I do, however, hope to wrap up the project in 2025, finish writing and hopefully, find a publisher willing to print such a thing. If any readers have any ideas in this regard, I’d love to hear from you…
    • More, more, more! I’ve already mentioned how much I love getting out there [in good company] to explore our region’s wildlife. In 2025, I am excited to launch several new courses as part of my role with NHSN. So far, new additions included standalone sessions on willowherbs and trees, a new grasses courses taking place over four instalments, and even a programme dedicated to wetland plants. That should keep me busy. I’m also excited to lead a wee holiday for the fabulous Greenwings.
    • Possibly a FISC. For the last few years, I’ve been interested in putting my botanical skills to the test and taking a FISC exam with the BSBI. Next year I might just do this, we’ll see.
    • Rediscovering insects. Aside from ladybirds, my interest in insects has waned a little in recent years, thanks largely to a core focus on botany. Next year, however, I am keen to do both and have resolved to dust off the moth trap and sweep net and start recording invertebrates once again. So far, contenders for this insect moths, hoverflies and bees.
    • Write more! Given this blogs slight resurgence this year, next year I want to dedicate much more time to sharing content on Common by Nature. What format that will take, I am unsure, but should time allow, you can expect much more in 2025. I’ll also be focusing attention on my new BlueSky account if anyone would like to join me on there…

    A Guide to Cotoneasters in Newcastle and North Tyneside

    I have a special fondness for cotoneasters, though I’m not entirely sure why. Perhaps it’s because they offer something of interest in every season, or simply because they don’t receive as much attention as other plant groups. Either way, I seem to spend a fair amount of time writing about them on this blog, and longer still roaming the city, taking samples and vexing myself over their identification.

    Cotoneasters are often considered one of the “trickier” plant groups to identify, and, as a result, are under-recorded across much of the UK, including here in Tyneside. Yet, they are fast becoming a notable part of our urban flora, and their diversity makes them deserving of more focused attention. Particularly given the fact that some species – including C. horizontalis and C. microphyllus – show a tendency to become invasive under specific circumstances.

    This brief “cotoneaster guide” aims to highlight the distribution and diversity of the cotoneaster species found in Newcastle and North Tyneside. It is not an exhaustive list —there are undoubtedly more species out there waiting to be discovered— but it aims to provide information on localised distributions for interested botanists, whether local or farther afield.

    Within this PDF, you’ll find maps, identification tips, and general habitat observations. However, this should not be considered a full “guide.” For that, I recommend Cotoneasters: A Comprehensive Guide to Shrubs for Flowers, Fruit, and Foliage by Fryer and Hylmö (2009), which remains the best resource on this group. Other fantastic resources, likely to be of help to botanists, include The Alien Plants of Belgium and of course, Stace’s New Flora of the British Isles.

    If you’d like to share a Cotoneaster record, feel free to email me at jamesmcommon@gmail.com or add your sighting to iRecord, where it will be picked up by a local vice-county recorder.

    Comparing Insect ID Apps for Budding Entomologists

    With several apps out there to choose from, just where do you turn when trying to identify a troublesome insect?

    My previous post focusing on the best plant identification apps has quickly turned into one of my highest preforming blogs ever with some 15,500 views to date. It seems that has technology improves, and mobile apps become a permanent part of the naturalist’s arsenal, there is a growing desire to find the best digital assistant for wildlife recording on the go. Cue a new post!

    Photo-based apps are growing in popularity across all wildlife groups and despite some turning their noses up at the idea, they are here to stay and have the possibility to engage and encourage an incredibly diverse audience. From teachers and students to citizen scientists and even, dare I say it, established naturalists, many are turning to apps to identify puzzling finds, confirm their identifications and corroborate identifications made using field guides. Moreover, technology is developing all of the time meaning apps previous dismissed as inaccurate are growing ever more reliable.

    Apps associated with plants and birds are fairly commonplace and many people use them, but less discussed is the possibility of using apps to identify insects – perhaps the most diverse and tricky group of all. Despite the challenges of insect identification, there are several apps out there designed to demystify the process. In this post, I thought I would run a little experiment comparing some of the most popular…

    First, some ground rules

    • One image only – some apps allow for multiple images but we’ll not be doing that here
    • Decent(ish) images – Poor quality images, lacking key features, pose problems for even the best apps (and naturalists!)
    • Verified species – apps will be tested only on species with a confirmed ID courtesy of an expert verifier
    • Native species only – I wanted to test this on insects likely to be encountered in the UK.

    Meet the Insect App Test subjects

    • Oak Bush-cricket (Meconema thalassinum)
    • Brown China-mark (Elophila nymphaeata)
    • Patchwork Leafcutter Bee (Megachile centuncularis)
    • Platycheirus rosarum – a hoverfly
    • Riponnensia splendens – a hoverfly
    • Larch Ladybird (Aphidecta obliterata)
    • Capsus ater – a true bug

    While some of these are easier than others, I have resisted the urge to include extremely common and familiar species which most apps will surely get right. Instead, the range of insect groups included should hopefully put our candidate apps to the test.

    Comparing Insect Apps

    Apps that identify the insect as their first choice will receive 1 point. If the correct insect is identified but shown as an outlying choice, we’ll deduct points for each subsequent tier. For example, Larch Ladybird coming in as the 4th most likely option would early 0.6 points. I may give extra points in some places if the apps manage to impress me…

    Oak
    Bush-cricket
    Brown
    China-mark
    Patchwork
    Leafcutter Bee
    Platycheirus rosarumRiponnensia splendensLarch LadybirdCapsus aterScore
    (0-6)
    ObsIdentify 11 0.9 1 1 1
    1
    6.9/7
    Seek1 ✖ 0.2
    (It did get the family!)
    0.2/7
    Picture Insect 1 1 11 1 16/7
    Google Lens 1 1 0.2
    (again, it got the family)
    0.2✖ 0.2
    (points for ‘ladybird’)
    2.6/7

    ObsIdentify vs Picture Insect

    And so we have our winner, or at least winners. Both ObsIdentify and Picture Insect performed extremely well during the first test and truth be told, there isn’t much between them. Let’s try them on a few more insects…

    For this, we’ll trial the apps on the lovely Green Long-horn (Adela reaumurella), another true bug, Calocoris roseomaculatus, and the tiny Meadow Ladybird (Rhyzobius litura). A reasonably testing bunch!

    Green Long-hornCalocoris roseomaculatusMeadow LadybirdScore
    (0-6)
    ObsIdentify1 0.9 0.92.8/3
    Picture Insect1 ✖ 0.2
    (it brought up a very similar species)
    ✖ 0.2
    (again, a similar species but failed to mention this one)
    1.4/3

    ObsIdentify (9.7/10)

    Hands down the best app for insect identification

    ObsIdentify performed extremely well across all insect groups and must be considered the ‘go to’ app for identifying insects. Based on the positive reviews shared elsewhere, it is perhaps unsurprising that it identified the easier Oak Bush-cricket and Brown China-mark correctly, but it surprised by accurately ID’ing the two hoverflies. Hoverfly identification can often be an arduous affair so extra brownie points here.

    Of the points 0.3 points deducted in total, on all occasions this was due to a separate but similar species being put forward as its primary identification. However, in all three cases, the true species was listed in second place which at least allows users to quickly compare species and reach a judgment for themselves.

    On a more practical note, ObsIdentify is very user-friendly and provides no end of handy information that some users might find interesting. It also works on more than just insects and overall, is a well-rounded and very helpful app. Top marks!

    Picture Insect (7.4/10)

    Another good choice for insect enthusiasts but jut falling short

    Picture Insect is a perfectly sound app and performs better than most. In the first round of testing, it excelled with the more familiar species and resulted in correct identifications when presented with more challenging species, particularly Capsus ater and Platycheirus rosarum. Both of these proved too much for apps further down the list.

    A solid choice for second place, the app only fell short at the last hurdle, failing to identify Calocoris roseomaculatus and Meadow Ladybird very nearly nailed by ObsIdentify. Indeed, neither species were shown in the four available suggestions shown by Picture Insect, but it did at least put us in the right ball park.

    While a good choice for use on common and familiar species, I did find the app somewhat annoying on account of the frequent pop-ups prompting paid subscription. The interface is also a little more complex that our winning option.

    Google Lens (2.6/7)

    This one ought to do better…

    Google Lens is perhaps the most widely used app on this list, with a great many people using it for everything from foodstuffs to wildlife. Given the infrastructure behind it, it ought to have outperformed some of the less well-resourced apps but alas, failed at almost every hurdle.

    Points were awarded for its success in identifying Oak Bush-cricket and Brown China-mark but beyond these, it succeeded only in correctly identifying several species to family level. If, like me, you like to know specifics, it probably isn’t for you.

    Seek (1.1/7)

    Not again iNaturalist…

    When it comes to purpose-built wildlife identification apps, Seek by iNaturalist is perhaps the most widely known (and used) of all. Indeed, I frequently encounter students using the app at the recommendation of their lecturers and have chanced upon a fair number of naturalists using it the field. They shouldn’t bother.

    Oh iNaturalist, what went wrong yet again? If you read my previous post on plant ID apps, you’ll know that Seek came almost last. It performed almost as negatively this time, succeeding only with the Brown China-mark. This is somewhat troubling given its widespread use and ties with what is fast becoming the most widespread biological recording app in the UK. Yikes.

    I would avoid Seek save for its use in positive environmental engagement. Like iNaturalist who developed it, it makes wildlife recording fun and would be a great choice for weekend walks with the kids if little else.

    Identifying Oxalis

    Get started identifying the widespread Wood-sorrels (Oxalis) you’re most likely encounter in a new, simplified crib

    Thank you all so much for continuing to read and download recent entries in this series of accessible plant cribs. It has been a while since I shared one (they are very much a project for the darker months) so I thought I would get back into the swing of things by sharing another challenging plant family.

    After tackling common grasses the last time around, now seemed like a good time to focus on something a little more colourful – introducing our pesky urban Wood-sorrels (Oxalis)

    The wood-sorrels are an interesting group of low-growing, largely perennial plants with five-petaled flowers in shades of pink, red, white and yellow. While our native Wood-sorrel (Oxalis acetosella) is very much a plant of woodlands, most are plants of human-influenced habitats – think pavements, gutters, flowerbeds and driveways. In my native Newcastle, around 8 species are infrequently encountered about these habitats, though several others are likely to occur too. The simplified key below covers those most likely to be encountered in the North East but please note, there are several rarer ones out there.

    Key factors to focus on when identifying oxalis are flower colour (which can help separate them nicely into groups), flower detail, leaflet number and leaf detail.

    Identifying Oxalis

    Oxalis are a moderately diverse bunch. Here, we’ll aim to cover the species botanists are most likely to encounter while out and about in urban areas across the North East; though the information shared should apply equally well elsewhere in the UK. This crib focuses the following species:

    • Upright Yellow-sorrel
    • Procumbent Yellow-sorrel
    • Least Yellow-sorrel
    • Wood-sorrel
    • Pale Pink-sorrel
    • Common Pink-sorrel
    • Large-flowered Pink-sorrel
    • Broad-leaved Pink-sorrel
    • Four-leaved Pink-sorrel
    • Annual Pink-sorrel

    Enjoying this series? Please consider sharing this page with friends or better still, providing a back-link so that more people can find it. If you have any suggestions for further groups to cover, I’d love to hear from you.

    Bullate Leaved Cotoneasters with Red/Orange Fruits

    In this new series of blogs, I hope to condense the available information associated with different groupings of cotoneasters. This will include wild and naturalised species but also some available in horticulture and thus, likely to occur in the future. References are provided.

    Medium shrubs to small trees with subcoriaceous leaves boasting a strongly bullate [blistered] upper surface and often, deeply impressed veins. Most fall into series Bullati (Flinck & B. Hylmö) but several other superficially similar species known to occur are also included.

    Of these cotoneasters, only Hollyberry Cotoeaster (Cotoneaster bullatus) and Bullate Cotoneaster (Cotoneaster rehderi) are known to occur widely in the UK and are often confused. Several other species, most notably Bois’s Cotoneaster (Cotoneaster boisianus) and Firebird Cotoneaster (Cotoneaster ignescens) are known to occur more scantly but may have been overlooked. More species still are available in horticulture and grown in botanical gardens and arboretums and as such, as liable to occur in the future.

    Fruits Red

    C. bullatusC. rehderiC. obscurus
    FruitGlobose or obovoid, 7-8mm, rich red, shiny, glabrescent, calyx lobes depressed; nutlets 5 (rarely 4).Globose or depressed globose, 8-11mm, bright red, shiny, calyx lobes flat; nutlets 4-5.Obovoid, 7-9mm, red to maroon, shiny, glabrous, calyx lobes flat; nutlets 3-4.
    Flowers12-30 flowered. Corolla closed or with small opening, petals red and pale pink with a greenish pink border; filaments pale pink, anthers white.10-30 flowered. Corolla closed, petals red or maroon with pink border; filaments pink, anthers white.7-12 flowered. Corolla closed, petals pink and greenish white with some red; filaments red and pink, anthers white.
    Leaf size55-90mm x 26-46mm70-210mm x 45-90mm25-45mm x 12-28mm
    Leaf aboveBullate, initially reddish brown, shiny, initially pilose; veins 6-9 impressed.Strongly bullate, mid-green, shiny, slightly pilose, veins 8-11 impressed. Bullate, dark green, slightly shiny, initially strigose; veins 3-5 impressed.
    Leaf belowVillous, especially on midrib.Lightly green, initially yellowish strigose.Somewhat reticulate, yellowish tomentose-villous.
    BranchletsMaroon, initially yellowish piloseMaroon and lenticellate, initially pilose.Maroon, initially yellowish pilose
    UK Status2388 records (Sept 2024)3612 records (Sept 2024)10 records (Sept 2024)
    CommentCommon in some partsPerhaps the most likely species to be found in all habitats across the UK.Rather unlikely
    A comparison of Cotoneaster bullatus and select similar species recorded in the UK

    Similar Species in Cultivation

    Cotoneaster emeiensis has large leaves reminiscent of C. rehderi (120-160mm x 55-60mm) and could be easily confused. It has slightly smaller fruits (8-9mm) and it’s flowers differ with petals that are red with a brownish-red base and a pink border. It is now available for sale in the UK, and has been planted at select botanical gardens.

    Cotoneaster ataensis has smaller leaves than the species above (35-50mm x 25-33mm) but shares the rich red fruits. It differs in having 3-9 flowers, each with an open corolla and petals which are red with a blackish-purple base and a pink border. Fryer & Hylmö (2009) state that this species is widespread in cultivation but often mislabelled as C. bullatus.

    Cotoneaster atuntzensis could be mistaken for either C. bullatus or C. rehderi. It has shortly obovoid fruits (8-9mm) with 3-4 nutlets and petals which are pale pink and greenish with an off white border.

    Fruits Orange-red to Orange

    C. ignescensC. boisianusC. sikangensis
    FruitObovoid or depressed globose, 9-10mm, orange-red, shiny, sparsely pilose, calyx lobes flat; nutlets 3-4. Obovoid, 9-11mm, orange-red, base pilose, calyx lobes flat; nutlets 4-5.Obovoid, 9-11mm, orange-red, subglabrous, calyx lobes flat; nutlets 3-5 (mostly 5).
    Flowers3-13 flowered. Corolla with small opening, petals reddish brown with a pink or off-white border; filaments red and pink, anthers white.9-18 flowered. Corolla closed, petals red with a dark red base and pale pink border; filaments red and pink, anthers white. 3-15 flowered. Corolla closed or with small opening, petals pink with greenish brown or white stripe, border off-white; filaments pale pink, anthers white.
    Leaf size38-50mm x 23-28mm (subcoriaceous)46-60mm x 22-32mm (chartaceous)26-40mm x 13-24mm (subcoriaceous)
    Leaf aboveBullate, dark green, shiny, strigose; veins 5-7 impressed.Slightly bullate, dark green, dull, pilose-strigose; veins 6-8 impressed.Bullate, dark green, shiny, pilose-strigose; veins 4-6 impressed.
    Leaf belowDensely whitish pilose-villousReticulate, yellowish pilose.Densely villous-pilose
    BranchletsMaroon, initially pilose-strigose.Maroon, strigose-pilose.Maroon, initially yellowish pilose
    UK Status9 records (Sept 2024)36 records (Sept 2024)Not yet recorded
    CommentHighly unlikelyGrows easily from seed in my experience so perhaps one to hunt for!Apparently available in horticulture
    A comparison of Cotoneaster ignescens and select similar species recorded in the UK

    References

    1. Dickoré, W.B. & Kasperek, G. (2010). Species of Cotoneaster (Rosaceae, Maloideae) indigenous to, naturalising or commonly cultivated in Central Europe. Willdenowia 40: 13-45
    2. Verloove, Filip. (2014). Het genus Cotoneaster in België. Dumortiera. 103. 3-29.
    3. Fryer, J.; Hylmö, B. (2009). Cotoneasters: a comprehensive guide to shrubs for flowers, fruit, and foliage. Timber Press, Portland.
    4. Verloove F. (2024). Manual of the Alien Plants of Belgium. Botanic Garden Meise, Belgium.